Skip to main content

Cisco Catalyst 3550

More
19 years 11 months ago #3788 by Chris
Replied by Chris on topic Re: Cisco Catalyst 3550
You're certainly on the right track ! :wink:

Chris Partsenidis.
Founder & Editor-in-Chief
www.Firewall.cx
More
19 years 11 months ago #3798 by sahirh
Replied by sahirh on topic Re: Cisco Catalyst 3550
'redundant ethernet links' = explain ?


Wow it feels nice to *ask* a question for a change !!
lol

Sahir Hidayatullah.
Firewall.cx Staff - Associate Editor & Security Advisor
tftfotw.blogspot.com
More
19 years 11 months ago #3811 by TheBishop
Replied by TheBishop on topic Redundant Ethernet Links
In Ethernet you can't have any network loops, formed by more than one Ethernet connection between two points. If you do, you get the packet equivalent of feedback (well known to heavy metal guitarists sahir) and broadcast storms etc. So when you have redundant Ethernet links you use Spanning Tree Protocol or one of its more modern variants to block all but one possible path. If you lose that path, spanning tree can re-enable one of the other ones and maintain connectivity. That's the theory anyway, but in practice it's clunky and the users have more than enough time to see the transition!
More
19 years 11 months ago #3812 by Chris
Replied by Chris on topic Re: Cisco Catalyst 3550
Sahir,

Redundant Ethernet links means that there are at least 2 links to each switch for full redundancy. Should one link fail, the other one takes over and the network continues to operate.

To be acurate, the links are actually fiber gigabit links as they connect to the network backbone switches.

To help you get an idea, the diagram would look something like this:

switch======root switch=====switch

Here we've got two normal switches connected with redundant links (=) to a root switch.

What's important to note is that not both links to each switch are active. Because the above setup would cause loops in the network, one of the two links is blocked, while the other remains active. This is done pretty much automatically by the STP protocol which will be covered after the VLAN topic as you already know.

Cheers!

Chris Partsenidis.
Founder & Editor-in-Chief
www.Firewall.cx
More
19 years 11 months ago #3814 by Neon
Replied by Neon on topic Re: Cisco Catalyst 3550
Speaking of STP my LINKSYS Wireless Broadband Router (WRT54G) runs the STP. I was surprised to find STP running.
More
19 years 11 months ago #3816 by sahirh
Replied by sahirh on topic Re: Cisco Catalyst 3550
*slaps head in disgust*... ahh a switching loop.. I knew that :)
Didn't know it was called a redundant link though.

Sahir Hidayatullah.
Firewall.cx Staff - Associate Editor & Security Advisor
tftfotw.blogspot.com
Time to create page: 0.150 seconds