Hot Downloads



The forum is in read only mode.
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: Collision Domains

Collision Domains 14 years 10 months ago #4211

Are collision domains good or bad? An can someone explain why please. Thanks

Collision Domains 14 years 10 months ago #4214

Collisions are integral to the way Ethernet works, so I suppose you could say they are good, because if Ethernet didn't work most of us would be out of a job!
A big, in-depth discussion is probably not the right thing to do in a post, but if you want more (much, much more) detail, have a look at the excellent Ethernet tutorial under the Networking menu at the top of the site page
However, to try to directly address your point, what you want when using Ethernet is a collision domain that is not too big. If you have too many devices and/or too 'long' a segment then you get too many collisions occuring and so get worse performance. Hence the use of bridges and/or switches to break the network up into smaller collision domains

Re: Collision Domains 14 years 9 months ago #4235

smaller collision domains = good thing
large collision domains = bad thing
Sahir Hidayatullah. Staff - Associate Editor & Security Advisor
  • Page:
  • 1
Time to create page: 0.128 seconds


Cisco Routers

  • SSL WebVPN
  • Securing Routers
  • Policy Based Routing
  • Router on-a-Stick

VPN Security

  • Understand DMVPN
  • GRE/IPSec Configuration
  • Site-to-Site IPSec VPN
  • IPSec Modes

Cisco Help

  • VPN Client Windows 8
  • VPN Client Windows 7
  • CCP Display Problem
  • Cisco Support App.

Windows 2012

  • New Features
  • Licensing
  • Hyper-V / VDI
  • Install Hyper-V


  • File Permissions
  • Webmin
  • Groups - Users
  • Samba Setup