Hot Downloads

Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: dhcp vs static

dhcp vs static 9 years 5 months ago #20658

  • ashine
  • ashine's Avatar
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: 0
hey all..

as a part of our final yr proj,v r proposin a revamped design of our coll LAN(700 odd PCs and 7 departments)..currently all da IPs are manually assigned...jus wanted to hw significant a differnece wuld implemnting DHCP mk(since v r propsoin a VLAN design)...does it cause additonal overload or is easier to manage..? also if u guys culd suggest sum gud links for dhco wuld b of gr8 help!!
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: dhcp vs static 9 years 5 months ago #20669

  • smitherton
  • smitherton's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Frequent Member
  • Posts: 60
  • Karma: 0
My first suggestion would be to brush up up on your professional writing skills. Secondly, I would shoot myself if I was the admin of a network that had 700 hosts all of which are using a static addressing scheme. As far as implementing a DHCP server, Windows Server will do just fine, or you could use DHCP on your router, (depending on model)
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: dhcp vs static 9 years 5 months ago #20672

  • KiLLaBeE
  • KiLLaBeE's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Expert Member
  • Posts: 466
  • Karma: 0
smitherton,

Is there an advantage to having a dedicated Windows Server 2003 running as a DHCP server V.S. having a router to provide the DHCP service?

Thanks,
K
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: dhcp vs static 9 years 5 months ago #20674

  • smitherton
  • smitherton's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Frequent Member
  • Posts: 60
  • Karma: 0
I do not consider myself to be a professor in windows 2003, but I could see advantages in using Windows 2003 for DHCP for several reasons:

1)Delegate control through active directory
2)Good integration with Windows DNS. When DHCP updates an address it updates records in the DNS database.
3)A nice GUI with good reporting and stats
4)Detects unauthorized DHCP servers in network.

I am not saying that windows is the only software that will do these things, but they do make it pretty easy.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: dhcp vs static 9 years 5 months ago #20678

  • Smurf
  • Smurf's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 1390
  • Karma: 1
4)Detects unauthorized DHCP servers in network.

Isn't that providing its a Windows DHCP services that is on the network ?
Wayne Murphy
Firewall.cx Team Member
www.firewall.cx

Now working for a Security Company called Sec-1 Ltd in the UK, for any
Penetration Testing work visit www.sec-1.com or PM me for details.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: dhcp vs static 9 years 5 months ago #20693

  • smitherton
  • smitherton's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Frequent Member
  • Posts: 60
  • Karma: 0
I am not sure, I know that a DHCP server will send a DHCPINFORM via multicast is it then possible to restrict what hosts are in the multicast group?
The administrator has disabled public write access.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Time to create page: 0.083 seconds

CCENT/CCNA

Cisco Routers

  • SSL WebVPN
  • Securing Routers
  • Policy Based Routing
  • Router on-a-Stick

VPN Security

  • Understand DMVPN
  • GRE/IPSec Configuration
  • Site-to-Site IPSec VPN
  • IPSec Modes

Cisco Help

  • VPN Client Windows 8
  • VPN Client Windows 7
  • CCP Display Problem
  • Cisco Support App.

Windows 2012

  • New Features
  • Licensing
  • Hyper-V / VDI
  • Install Hyper-V

Linux

  • File Permissions
  • Webmin
  • Groups - Users
  • Samba Setup